Up in the Air-Educators Juggling the Potential of Generative AI with Detection, Discipline, and Distrust (Center for Democracy and Technology)

The report is important for educators because it sheds light on the challenges and risks associated with the use of generative AI in the classroom. It highlights the need for clear policies, guidance, and training to ensure responsible and safe use of generative AI by both teachers and students. Educators can use this information to advocate for better policies and support systems that protect student privacy, promote academic integrity, and address disciplinary issues related to generative AI use.

The key takeaways of the report “Up in the Air: Educators Juggling the Potential of Generative AI with Detection, Discipline, and Distrust” are as follows:

Progress in Training and Guidance: Schools have made significant progress in terms of setting policies and providing guidance on generative AI since the previous school year. More schools have adopted policies and procedures regarding generative AI use, and teachers have received formal training on generative AI use policies and procedures.

Reliance on AI Content Detection Tools: Teachers are heavily reliant on school-sanctioned AI content detection tools to detect generative AI-generated content. However, research shows that these tools are ineffective. This reliance on ineffective tools can have negative consequences for students, especially given the lack of guidance on how to respond to suspected misuse of generative AI.

Increase in Student Discipline: There has been an increase in disciplinary action against students due to generative AI use. Marginalized students, such as those with disabilities and English learners, are particularly at risk for disciplinary action.

Distrust in Student Academic Integrity: Teachers express increased distrust in their students’ academic integrity due to generative AI use. This distrust is more pronounced in schools where generative AI is banned. Teachers from schools that ban generative AI are more likely to report disciplinary action against students.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started