This document serves as a foundational tool for policymakers, companies, and civil society to understand and address the human rights implications of generative AI. It highlights the need for a rights-based approach to AI governance, ensuring that the development and deployment of this technology do not undermine fundamental human rights.
Importance of the Document
- Human Rights Framework: The document emphasizes the importance of framing the risks of generative AI in terms of internationally agreed human rights. This approach ensures that discussions about AI impacts are grounded in legally and morally recognized standards.
- Operationalizing UNGPs: By linking AI risks to the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs), the document provides a practical way to govern generative AI through existing state duties and corporate responsibilities.
- Focus on Vulnerable Groups: The taxonomy highlights that generative AI often exacerbates risks for groups already vulnerable or marginalized, such as women, girls, and populations in the Global South.
Main Takeaways
- Human rights at risk: The document categorizes several human rights that may be adversely impacted by generative AI, including:
- Freedom from Physical and Psychological Harm
- Right to Equality Before the Law and to Protection against Discrimination
- Right to Privacy
- Right to Own Property
- Freedom of Thought, Religion, Conscience, and Opinion
- Freedom of Expression and Access to Information
- Right to Take Part in Public Affairs
- Right to Work and to Gain a Living
- Rights of the Child
- Rights to Culture, Art, and Science
- Real-world examples: For each right, the document provides real-world scenarios where generative AI has posed or could pose threats, illustrating the practical implications of these risks. This section might be particularly interesting for teachers who arrange lessons on generative AI risks, as it offers concrete examples that can be used to facilitate discussions and enhance understanding among students! (p.8/10/11/13/15/16).
- Interdependence of rights: It underscores that human rights are interrelated and interdependent. A single use case of generative AI might affect multiple rights simultaneously, depending on various factors such as geography and the specific groups affected.
- Emerging risks: The document notes that as generative AI technology evolves, new risks to human rights will likely emerge, necessitating ongoing assessment and adaptation of governance frameworks.
AI Advisory Boards 